« Home | Hyperopia Double Whammy » | LASIK Thought Of The Day: PRK Enhancements » | LASIK Update » | LASIK Thought Of the Day: Trends » | LASIK Thought of the Day: LASIK in the Elderly » | LASIK Thought Of The Day: Pregnancy » | LASIK Thought of the Day: Enhancements » | LASIK Thought Of The Day: "Am I a good candidate f... » | LASIK Thought Of The Day: Presbyopia » | Thought For The Day: Healing Time » 

Saturday, May 07, 2011 

22 Years of LASIK

The first FDA clinical trial in the United States began in 1989. At that time, LASIK was not available, so the early procedures were PRK, or photorefractive keratectomy. PRK treats the surface of the cornea with the excimer laser. In contrast, LASIK creates a thin flap in the cornea, laser treatment is applied to the corneal bed, and the flap is repositioned. We still perform PRK in about 10% of our patients, and seeing these patients after fifteen or twenty years reminds me what a great procedure PRK is. LASIK is probably even a better procedure than PRK, and this is why 90% of our patients chose LASIK. The use of the femtosecond laser (IntraLase) has improved the safety and accuracy of LASIK by leaps and bounds.

The visual results in LASIK and PRK are the same. The big difference is in the recovery time. LASIK patients obtain good vision a day or two after their procedure, whereas PRK patients may take a week, or two, to recover. There is also more postoperative pain with PRK, although we have some pretty good ways of minimizing the pain. So, why do some patients still have PRK rather than LASIK? There are four reasons. 1. The cornea may be too thin for LASIK, but thick enough for PRK. 2. There may be some corneal irregularities, or scars, which make PRK a safer procedure than LASIK. 3. There may be concern about displacement of the LASIK flap in people subject to head, or eye, trauma. 4. If previous corneal surgery was done, PRK may be a better option.

Both LASIK and PRK are remarkable for the stability of the vision correction. Less than 10% of patients require a touch-up, or “enhancement” procedure. In our practice, 92% have not needed an enhancement. And when enhancements are done, the cost is minimal, the improvement is predictable, and recovery is quick. Looking back over the last two decades, a few facts are striking. Patients often say that laser vision correction was the best thing they ever did. The elimination of glasses or contact lenses overnight is a truly remarkable feature for any ophthalmic procedure, or any surgical procedure at all. The safety of LASIK and PRK with modern technology is impressive. Serious adverse events are far less than one percent.

Laser vision correction is probably the best procedure to come along in ophthalmology during the last fifty years. What are the challenges for the future? Well, it would be nice to create a bifocal effect in the cornea, so people over 43 years of age would not have to wear reading glasses. But, this seems like such a difficult optical feat, it may be many years before someone figures out how to do it. In the mean time, patients over 43 can chose monovision, or buy reading glasses in the drug store.

Good post but I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Appreciate it! lasik eye surgery risk statistics

Post a Comment

About me

  • I'm LASIKblog
  • From La Jolla, California, United States
  • Mitchell Friedlaender, M.D., is Head of the Division of Ophthalmology, and Director of the Laser Vision Center at Scripps Clinic, in La Jolla, CA, and Adjunct Professor at The Scripps Research Institute. He is a cum laude graduate of the University of Michigan Medical School, and received his ophthalmology training at Harvard University, and the University of California, San Francisco. He was a full time faculty member at the University of California, San Francisco before joining Scripps Clinic in 1986. He is the author of 6 books and over 250 scientific articles. He has lectured at universities throughout the world on conditions such as blepharitis, allergy, dry eye, and infection. He is the recipient of the Senior Honor Award of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, and a member of the American Ophthalmological Society, an honor society composed of 300 leaders in ophthalmology. He has been listed every year, since 1986, in The Best Doctors in America.
My profile
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates